The Fleischer Brothers in Florida wanted
to establish an East Coast "Disney" Studio, so they turned out some
fine shorts and even some cartoon-features ..Production and artwork at times,
were very-very good. Though their best efforts may have been the 4O's Superman
color cartoons, many fans believe"Gulliver" an excellent effort to try
and match "Snow White"...and as a new cartoon-factory ..they almost
did it with this feature. It had some memorable moments to see and songs to hum.
This is a real Favorite ...FOR MANY....!
Reviewer: gusferatu -
- September 6, 2006 Subject: gullivers travels a combination of the traditional Fleischer studios and early Disney
studios animation styles. They sometimes blend well together , sometimes not.
young children usually like it(i know mine did) but most adults probably wont.
having been raised on a variety of animation styles ( Warner Bros.
-hanna/barbera- early anime-early computer graphics) the 35-50 year olds out
there (and the very young) haven't been weaned on the cartoons of the past
decade , which for the most part are either overly complicated , and cannot keep
up with demand and are soon lost or forgotten , or they are one in a long list
of the same crap half of the foreign market studios are producing for us
(pokeman-et. all). given a chance , this film might delight them , but that
audience usually wont give up the time to view something in a style that they
are not overly familiar with. for those a little older , or a little younger ,
this is a pleasant little film. grandparents or parents with really young
children---this could be some really nice quality time together.
Reviewer: obieone
-
- January 25, 2005 Subject: Memories of this movie I feel a little bad about correcting Mr. Landless' critical view of this
film in that "The Road to El Dorado" was produced by Dreamworks skg
Studios and not Disney. That being said his review was great.
I am 65 years old (nee: 1939), at this writing, and Gulliver is the same age. I
can remember my Mother taking me to the re-release of it when I was about 5 at
the Fox Theater in Oakland, California. The Disney studios used the Multi-Plane
camera to do "Snow White" 2 years earlier and the Flischers use the
"Register and Shoot" method which is simple two Dimension.
The film was done by the Fleischer Brothers, Dave and Max, who also invented
Popeye the Sailor and other memorable characters for Paramount (Famous Studios).
Another film they made was "Hoppity Goes to Town". Dave was killed in
World War 2 and the features ceased. It is said that had he lived, he would have
given Walt Disney real competition. You have to remember that the film industry
was only about 38 years old and sound came in in 1929 with optical tracks.
This has always been one of my favorite films, but as mentioned in another
review, the song "Alls Well" is omitted. This comes in when the little
guy discovers the "Giant on the Beach" and long before the two Kings
are talking about the forthcoming wedding. This sequence is short but adds to
the story and sets the mood of the character (Fear).
I have seen this film several times and have rented it for my kids to see and
now my grandson who is just 2 years old.
Yes, Gulliver is a classic film and well worth adding to your collections. It
has sustained over the years and hopefully for many more.
Reviewer: Jason
Landless -
- November 14, 2004 Subject: Preserves Visual and Audio
Quality, But Moves Slowly This animated edition of Swift's classical utopian fable "Gulliver's
Travels" is not only an amusing, if incomplete, rendition of the old tale,
but also provides the viewer with an interesting insight into the differences
between what is produced by the modern animation industry and what was produced
by its counterpart in the 1930's.
The first thing that stands out is the length of the scenes. Compared to recent
Disney releases, such as "The
Road to El Dorado", where the length of the scenes are short,
choppy and contain myriad angles and special effects, Gulliver's Travels is far
more sedate. Its various angle shots are few and the film's scene length hints
at a time when children and adults had more patience and longer attention spans.
Obviously there is little point in taking the time to download a film unless one
can be assured of reasonable audio and visual quality - you want to be able to
actually see what is being displayed on your screen and hear what is filtering
through your speakers. By the same token, some degree of tolerance is to be
expected from the viewer for the technological limitations of the era that, for
example, invariably captured sound with a typical "monotonal pitched
hollowness" so characteristic of the 1930's microphone devices. Also, it is
to be remembered that this film was designed for, and intended to be used in, a
cinema theatre in front of a large audience on a large screen, at a time when
colour was the exception and not the norm. While people might have been willing
to forgive "colour ripples" (where the inking seems to crawl or ripple
from one scene to the next as a consequence of each frame being painted by
hand), modern audiences are less inclined to be patient or sympathetic with such
things.
However, if these elements of production are taken into account in an
intelligent and serious way, the sound quality and the visual quality of the
download is remarkably good. At times it is difficult to distinguish precisely
what is being said, particularly as animated films utilize, by definition, silly
cartoon voices. But on the most part the dialogue is intelligible. There are no
problems with the video component of the download, being mostly crisp and clear.
I recommend the MPEG4 download as a good trade-off between size of the file and
playback quality. (The MP4 codec is available for free on the internet, and is
only about a megabyte in size).
As for the film itself, one of the most noticeable peculiarities is that the
dialogue is comparatively sparse when considered against the backdrop of a
modern cartoon or animated film, where the characters seem to talk non-stop.
Another interesting facet is to note the strong theatrical and operatic
influence on the production, which is seen in several dancing scenes, musical
scenes and other very lengthy scenes of action and movement. It is important to
point out that these very lengthy scenes may serve to diminish viewer
appreciation of the story as a whole. At the time "Gulliver's Travels"
was made, it was clearly envisioned that the audience would appreciate simply
looking at amusing characters doing amusing things, which might not necessarily
contribute to the overall plot.
The moral quality of the film is also interesting, being virtually obsolete by
the standards of our age. For instance, it is assumed from the outset that
marriage is the only acceptable relationship between men and women, that
powerful giants ought not to abuse their influence and position, but ought to
lower themselves to be subordinate to the interests of those weaker than
themselves. The film also assumes that rivalry between nations is a natural
condition but one which may be curbed and softened by the careful and thoughtful
application of limited force. Certainly, more than anything else, this provides
the viewer with a deep and meaningful insight into the pysche and social
condition of the period.
As animated films go, it is not breakneck amusement with subtle intrigues as a
plot device, and consequently it may not hold the viewer's attention as readily
as other films - especially at one scene where the Lilliputians are trussing
Gulliver up with a complex arrangement of ropes and scaffolding, a process that
seems to last for a terribly long time - but altogether it is a worthwhile
acquisition that no serious collection of historical films can afford to lack.
MovieShame.
There have always been lots of movies that show or exploit sex, but far fewer
that try to explore it seriously, as a rich, meaningful subject, whether
psychological or social...
A Christmas Carol Seymour Hicks plays
the title role of Scrooge in the first
sound version of the Dickens classic about ..